You can start your video and mic

whoever is the host should be able to click the shield icon near the bottom and allow others to share their screen

we can see it

I can see it.

yes we can

🙂

Thank you everyone. It takes a village.

Thank you to Dean Davis. True leadership.

When I logged on it was recording automatically

i pressed record in case but we can ask IT which host account is automatically recording

Patrick's video is on

We have several questions …I can save them to the end or copy them in the chat ahead of time

Yes! Thank you Professor Crusto.

In response to the recording question. The College of Law is recording the full symposium. Panelists do have access to record their session locally to their computer. You are welcome to do so, but once your session is over and are moved to an attendee you won't have access to record the other sessions.

We will share the full recording once the symposium is over.

Right, but prosecutors often don't require BARD when considering whether to bring charges. That's why prosecutors like Wesley Bell and Rachel Rollins making a public standard of applying BARD on the front end before bringing a charge is so important.

Perhaps in Kentucky they apply BARD in deciding charges, but many other prosecutors offices don't.

A number of prosecutors offices do not apply the beyond a reasonable doubt standard when deciding whether to bring charges. They use a lower standard (for example, probable cause, or an even lower standard).

YES! Where are the gun rights activists on this? Absolutely appalling double standard.

I am so glad this was said and brought up.

yes, explain that

Kenneth Walker was not the initial aggressor.

also are you all recording this??

facts

we are recording.

Yes, you can see the ‘Recording’ notation in the upper left.

Cnn good let me know on time

exactly. That's why Paul Butler's fictitious prosecutor opening argument in Breonna Taylor prosecutions for homicide is so compelling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysuecIwQMMw

*opening statement

Why are the Police protected at such a higher standard than the normal citizen? The laws should apply to equally with few exceptions.

thanks! do you have the ability to turn on the closed captioning?

does someone from IT have access to closed captioning - youtube may automatically have it on

How does us as a society hold District Attorney's and Attorney General's accountable for the negligent behaviors? There should be some oversight and accountability to the bad actors in these positions.

Well said, Professor Marcosson. Very unfortunate.

What a brutal and heart wrenching truth.

that’s a shame.

My students are singing your praises on a chat line

Well said.... This is not right.

Prof. Mannheimer, can the recklessness analysis encompass executing the warrant in the middle of the night and failure to knock & announce?

Is it “reasonably” believed??? The statute just says “believes.” Looks like a subjective standard - which is even more favorable to the cops in this case.

It says "believed" but if they were unreasonable, they could be liable under 503.120 (imperfect self-defense). That's basically what Sam M. said.

They do matter. Thank you.

Excellent points, Prof. Scott!

Thank you Prof. Crusto. We're always told what the law is, but we should be demanding a change in the law that fails to protect us (Black people).

Someone is asking about turning on spotlight speaker mode

To Sandra: It says "believed" but if they were unreasonable, they could be liable under 503.120 (imperfect self-defense). That's basically what Sam M. said.

Right. Got it. Sent that question off too quickly, sorry!

Something has to be done about the lying and hiding from our police departments.

Something has to be done about the lying and hiding from our police departments.

thank you! very enlightening!

Excellent panel. Thank you so much!

Thank you, all!

Thank you!

thank you for your time

Thanks, everyone!